Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) Model Lead Based Paint Risk Assessor Practice Test

What is a significant con of building component replacement?

1. It significantly increases property value

2. It can be combined with renovation work

3. It generates large amounts of waste which could be costly

4. It provides a permanent solution to all lead hazards

The correct answer is: It generates large amounts of waste which could be costly

The selection of the third choice highlights a critical drawback of building component replacement, particularly in the context of lead hazard management. When existing materials are replaced, it often results in the generation of substantial amounts of waste, which can include not only the old building components but also contaminated dust and debris. This waste requires careful handling and disposal, especially when lead is present, to comply with environmental regulations. The costs associated with disposal, especially for hazardous materials, can be significant, potentially overwhelming the initial savings or benefits achieved from the renovation itself. Proper waste management practices must be implemented to avoid legal penalties and ensure public safety, which can add an additional financial burden to the project. While the other choices present some advantages of building component replacement, they do not address its negative environmental impact and the potential costs involved in waste management, making the third choice a noteworthy point of concern.